10

Text Size:

-A A +A

You are here

Opinions & Orders

The Court publishes opinions, precedential orders, all non-ministerial orders related to en banc cases, and orders disposing of mandamus petitions on the website after issuance has occurred on the official docket. Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above.
All dispositions are available in PACER.

Case Name or Appeal Number
Datesort ascending Appeal Number Origin Case Name Type
2015-09-04 15-1214 PATO DYNAMIC DRINKWARE, LLC v. NATIONAL GRAPHICS, INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2015-09-04 14-1218 DCT MEDIA RIGHTS TECHNOLOGIES v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP [OPINION] Precedential
2015-09-03 14-1673 DCT DOME PATENT L.P. v. LEE [OPINION] Precedential
2015-09-03 14-1203 PATO IN RE: TAM [ORDER RE MOTIONS FOR LEAVE TO PARTICIPATE]] Nonprecedential
2015-09-02 14-3101 MSPB COBERT v. MILLER [OPINION] Precedential
2015-09-02 14-5140 CFC TINTON FALLS LODGING REALTY v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2015-09-01 14-1564 DCT ALEXSAM, INC. v. THE GAP, INC. [ERRATA] Nonprecedential
2015-09-01 14-3113 MSPB SHAPIRO v. SSA [OPINION] Precedential
2015-09-01 15-1102 DCT SOCIEDAD ESPANOLA v. BLUE RIDGE X-RAY COMPANY [ERRATUM] Nonprecedential
2015-08-31 15-3122 MSPB GIBBS v. MSPB [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2015-08-31 14-1123 DCT POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. v. LEE [ERRATA] Precedential
2015-08-28 14-1431 DCT THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY v. NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION [OPINION] Precedential
2015-08-27 14-1305 DCT INLINE PLASTICS CORP. v. EASYPAK, LLC [OPINION] Precedential
2015-08-24 14-1466 PATO PROGRESSIVE CASUALTY v. LIBERTY MUTUAL [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2015-08-20 14-1596 DCT HYATT v. LEE [OPINION] Precedential
2015-08-20 14-1617 DCT LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL V. IMPRESSION PRODUCTS [ORDER] Nonprecedential
2015-08-19 15-3018 MSPB BARNES v. MSPB [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2015-08-19 14-1618 DCT ABT SYSTEMS, LLC v. EMERSON ELECTRIC CO. [OPINION] Precedential
2015-08-19 14-1789 PATO JACK WOLFSKIN AUSRUSTUNG v. NEW MILLENNIUM SPORTS, S.L.U. [OPINION] Precedential
2015-08-18 14-1841 DCT PERSONALIZED USER MODEL, LLP v. GOOGLE INC. [OPINION] Precedential

Pages