10

Text Size:

-A A +A

You are here

Opinions & Orders

The Court publishes opinions, precedential orders, all non-ministerial orders related to en banc cases, and orders disposing of mandamus petitions on the website after issuance has occurred on the official docket. Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above.
All dispositions are available in PACER.

Case Name or Appeal Number
Datesort ascending Appeal Number Origin Case Name Type
2018-11-14 17-2549 PATO WHATSAPP, INC. v. TRIPLAY, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-11-14 18-157 DCT IN RE: OATH HOLDINGS INC. [MOTION PANEL ORDER] Precedential
2018-11-14 17-1637 DCT ARCELORMITTAL ATLANTIQUE v. AK STEEL CORPORATION [OPINION] Precedential
2018-11-13 17-2252 MSPB SIHOTA v. IRS [OPINION] Precedential
2018-11-13 18-1013 PATO IN RE: A.H.C.S., INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-11-13 17-2231 MSPB BOSS v. DHS [OPINION] Precedential
2018-11-13 18-1160 PATO MASA LLC v. APPLE INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-11-13 18-1130 DCT ALLERGAN, INC. v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-11-13 17-2181 CAVC COOK v. WILKIE [OPINION] Precedential
2018-11-13 17-2446 MSPB SILER v. EPA [OPINION] Precedential
2018-11-13 18-1592 CFC ROLLE v. US [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-11-13 18-1093 PATO XACTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC. v. PICTOMETRY INTERNATIONAL CORP. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-11-13 18-2121 CFC STEKELMAN v. US [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-11-13 18-1289 PATO IN RE: MACOR [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-11-13 18-1469 DCT GAELCO S.A. v. ARACHNID 360, LLC [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-11-13 17-2408 DCT DIGITAL MEDIA TECHNOLOGIES v. NETFLIX, INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-11-13 18-1297 PATO CURT G. JOA, INC. v. FAMECCANICA.DATA S.P.A. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-11-09 17-2360 CFC FORD MOTOR COMPANY v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2018-11-09 17-1525 PATO ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2018-11-09 17-2336 PATO ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential

Pages