10

Text Size:

-A A +A

You are here

Opinions & Orders

The Court publishes opinions, precedential orders, all non-ministerial orders related to en banc cases, and orders disposing of mandamus petitions on the website after issuance has occurred on the official docket. Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above.
All dispositions are available in PACER.

Case Name or Appeal Number
Datesort ascending Appeal Number Origin Case Name Type
2018-04-04 17-2137 DCT SCHOELLER-BLECKMANN OILFIELD v. CHURCHILL DRILLING TOOLS US [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-04-04 17-2165 MSPB LITCHFIELD v. MSPB [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-04-04 17-1738 PATO GOLD CHARM LIMITED v. SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-04-03 17-1547 PATO EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v. REPRO-MED SYSTEMS, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-04-03 17-1466 CAVC SAUNDERS v. WILKIE [OPINION] Precedential
2018-04-03 17-2086 DCT BARCO, N.V. v. EIZO CORPORATION [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-04-02 17-1945 CIT WWRD US, LLC v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2018-04-02 17-1554 PATO RAYTHEON COMPANY v. SONY CORPORATION [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-30 17-1378 MSPB TRINKL v. MSPB [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-30 17-1200 MSPB BAL v. NAVY [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-30 17-1407 CIT THYSSENKRUPP STEEL v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-28 17-1313 PATO ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-28 17-1567 PATO SOPHOS LIMITED v. IANCU [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-28 17-1717 MSPB LLEDO v. OPM [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-28 15-1928 PATO BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE v. IANCU [ERRATA] Precedential
2018-03-27 17-1889 PATO MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. VANDOR CORPORATION [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-27 16-2601 PATO IN RE: BRANDT [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-27 17-1118 DCT ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-26 16-2509 PATO GOOGLE LLC v. NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-23 16-2523 PATO DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT v. APPLE INC. [OPINION] Precedential

Pages