10

Text Size:

-A A +A

RSS Feed

You are here

Opinions & Orders

The Court publishes opinions, precedential orders, all non-ministerial orders related to en banc cases, and orders disposing of mandamus petitions on the website after issuance has occurred on the official docket. Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above.
All dispositions are available in PACER.

Case Name or Appeal Number
Datesort ascending Appeal Number Origin Case Name Type
2018-03-30 17-1407 CIT THYSSENKRUPP STEEL v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-28 17-1313 PATO ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. v. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-28 17-1567 PATO SOPHOS LIMITED v. IANCU [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-28 17-1717 MSPB LLEDO v. OPM [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-28 15-1928 PATO BOSCH AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE v. IANCU [ERRATA] Precedential
2018-03-27 17-1889 PATO MATTHEWS INTERNATIONAL CORP. v. VANDOR CORPORATION [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-27 16-2601 PATO IN RE: BRANDT [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-27 17-1118 DCT ORACLE AMERICA, INC. v. GOOGLE INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-26 16-2509 PATO GOOGLE LLC v. NETWORK-1 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-23 16-2523 PATO DSS TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT v. APPLE INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-22 17-1101 PATO DELL INC. v. ACCELERON, LLC [ERRATA] Precedential
2018-03-21 16-1782 DVA GRAY v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS [ORDER DENYING EN BANC] Precedential
2018-03-21 17-1060 DCT CAVE CONSULTING GROUP, LLC v. OPTUMINSIGHT, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-21 17-1103 DCT SARIF BIOMEDICAL LLC v. BRAINLAB, INC. [OPINION] Nonprecedential
2018-03-20 16-2623 CIT GRK CANADA, LTD. v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-20 17-1584 CFC MERIDIAN ENGINEERING COMPANY v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-19 17-1304 PATO IN RE: POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-19 17-1101 PATO DELL INC. v. ACCELERON, LLC [OPINION] Precedential
2018-03-16 17-1131 PATO VIRNETX INC. v. APPLE INC. [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential
2018-03-16 17-1456 DCT AUTO-KAPS, LLC v. CLOROX COMPANY [RULE 36 JUDGMENT] Nonprecedential

Pages