10

Text Size:

-A A +A

RSS Feed

You are here

Opinions & Orders

The Court publishes opinions, precedential orders, all non-ministerial orders related to en banc cases, and orders disposing of mandamus petitions on the website after issuance has occurred on the official docket. Use the search boxes below to locate documents described above.
All dispositions are available in PACER.

Case Name or Appeal Number
Date Appeal Number Origin Case Name Typesort descending
2017-05-11 16-2233 PATO ROVALMA, S.A. v. BOHLER-EDELSTAHL GMBH & CO. KG [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-11 16-1599 DCT AYLUS NETWORKS, INC. v. APPLE INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-11 16-1576 DCT NOVA CHEMICALS CORPORATION v. DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-11 17-1517 PATO CASCADES PROJECTION LLC v. EPSON AMERICA, INC. [ORDER] Precedential
2017-05-16 16-1357 DCT ARCELORMITTAL v. AK STEEL CORPORATION [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-19 17-1645 DCT MYLAN INSTITUTIONAL LLC v. AUROBINDO PHARMA LTD. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-23 16-1841 ITC RIVERA v. ITC [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-24 16-1089 PATO JOSEPH PHELPS VINEYARDS, LLC v. FAIRMONT HOLDINGS, LLC [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-25 17-1232 MSPB LEE v. MSPB [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-26 16-2006 DCT HALO ELECTRONICS, INC. v. PULSE ELECTRONICS, INC. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-26 16-1315 CAVC OLLIS v. SHULKIN [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-26 16-1088 CIT US v. AMERICAN HOME ASSURANCE CO. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-30 16-2093 CIT SUNTEC INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-30 16-1649 CIT MAVERICK TUBE CORPORATION v. US [OPINION] Precedential
2017-05-31 16-1498 MSPB KITLINSKI v. MSPB [OPINION] Precedential
2017-06-01 16-1524 DCT PRESTON v. NAGEL [OPINION] Precedential
2017-06-02 16-2093 CIT SUNTEC INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. v. US [ERRATA] Precedential
2017-06-05 16-2427 DCT EVANS v. BUILDING MATERIALS CORPORATION [OPINION] Precedential
2017-06-05 16-1397 DCT CHECKPOINT SYSTEMS, INC. v. ALL-TAG SECURITY S.A. [OPINION] Precedential
2017-06-05 16-2521 DCT ROTHSCHILD CONNECTED DEVICES v. GUARDIAN PROTECTION SERVICES [OPINION] Precedential

Pages